Skip to content

Use of Harvest Aids in Louisiana Soybeans

Use of Harvest Aids in Louisiana Soybeans published on No Comments on Use of Harvest Aids in Louisiana Soybeans
Todd Spivey, Sebe Brown, Josh Copes, Donnie Miller, Boyd Padgett

Over the last several weeks, we have received numerous calls about soybean harvest aid timing, products, and general recommendations.  The use of harvest aids in Louisiana soybeans is a common practice, with timely applications improving seed quality and harvest efficiency while potentially resulting in a soybean harvest 10 to 14 days earlier when compared to non-treated beans.


If the goal of harvest aid use in soybeans is to promote early harvest and improved harvest efficiency, harvest aids must be applied as timely as possible.  Once seed have separated from the white membrane inside the pod, they have reached physiological maturity and will no longer increase in size.  Any use of a harvest aid prior to the majority of seed reaching physiological maturity will result in a loss in yield.  Table 1 gives the paraquat label requirements for harvest aid application timing in soybean. Research conducted in Louisiana by Dr. Jim Griffin and Joey Boudreaux established that a harvest aid application could be made to soybean without yield penalty as long as soybeans are at reproductive growth stage R6.5 (physiological maturity). They provided a list of procedures to help determine when harvest aids can be safely applied to soybeans:

  1. Begin to scout fields for harvest aid timing when leaves begin to yellow
  2. Collect pods from the top four nodes of the plant at multiple, random locations within a field
  3. Open soybeans from pod, they should shell easily, and look for soybean separation from the white membrane
  4. If soybean separation from the white membrane has occurred for all pods collected, the seed has reached maximum dry weight and harvest aid application can be made without yield penalty

Plant appearance at growth stage R6.5 will vary by variety so close attention should be made to pods collected from the field and if seed have separated from the white membrane (Griffin and Boudreaux 2011 Louisiana Agriculture magazine Vol. 54, No. 2, Spring 2011).

Table 1. Proper application timing of harvest aid in indeterminate and determinate soybean varieties.
Indeterminate Varieties 65% of pods have reached a mature brown color or seed moisture is less than 30%
Determinate Varieties Plants are mature; beans are fully developed, 50% of leaves have dropped and remaining leaves are yellowing.


Producers have several harvest aid options, though the typical harvest aid application consists of paraquat with an additional nonionic surfactant.  With excessive morningglory pressure, growers might consider including carfentrazone (Aim) or saflufenacil (Sharpen) with paraquat to improve desiccation of vines and in situations with high grass pressure, a tank-mix of paraquat with sodium chlorate may be warranted to improve the desiccation of grassy weeds prior to harvest.  Questions have also been received in regards to the use of sodium chlorate to aid in drift reduction of paraquat applications made by air.  The LSU AgCenter has no data to support this claim and only recommends the use of these products together for improved desiccation of weeds and soybeans present in the field.

It is also imperative that producers consider the required preharvest interval (PHI) associated with each product label.  When using multiple products, the longest PHI must be adhered to.  Labeled rates and comments are presented below in the excerpt from the 2017 Louisiana Suggested Weed Management Guide.

Labeled rates and comments of soybean harvest aid products from the 2017 Louisiana Suggested Weed Management Guide

Redbanded Stink Bug Considerations

Producers should also continue monitoring redbanded stink bug (RBSB) populations and should not rule out the inclusion of an insecticide with the application of a harvest aid.  LSU AgCenter entomologists recommend the control of threshold populations of RBSB until the soybeans are out of the field.  This means that many producers could, and should, include an insecticide for the control of RBSB with their harvest aid application (sodium chlorate cannot be tank-mixed with any insecticide).  It is important to keep in mind the restrictions placed upon many of the products at this point in the season.  These restrictions may include total active ingredient restrictions and PHIs.  Acephate, a common recommendation for RBSB control, can only be applied up to 2 lb ai A-1 year-1 in Louisiana.  Other insecticides also have increased PHI such as the pre-mix product Endigo, with a PHI of 30 days.  It is important to read and adhere to the label of all labeled materials prior to use.  When label restrictions prevent the inclusion of an insecticide with the harvest aid, producers should not delay the harvest of soybean so that the seed can be removed from the field as quick as the label allows.

2014 Northeast Research Station Pest Management and Crop Production Field Day

2014 Northeast Research Station Pest Management and Crop Production Field Day published on No Comments on 2014 Northeast Research Station Pest Management and Crop Production Field Day
NERS Field Day Flyer
NERS Field Day Flyer

Aerial 24C Labels for Capreno and Halex GT for Louisiana

Aerial 24C Labels for Capreno and Halex GT for Louisiana published on No Comments on Aerial 24C Labels for Capreno and Halex GT for Louisiana

Capreno Aerial Label in LA (12′-17′)              Halex GT Aerial Label in LA (14′)

Please follow the links above to view the specific labels.

2013 Cotton Harvest Aid Guidelines for Louisiana

2013 Cotton Harvest Aid Guidelines for Louisiana published on No Comments on 2013 Cotton Harvest Aid Guidelines for Louisiana

Dr. Donnie Miller, Professor, Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter

Dr. Daniel Stephenson, Associate Professor, Dean Lee Research and Extension Center, LSU AgCenter

Dr. David Kerns, Associate Professor, Macon Ridge Research Station, LSU AgCenter

Please see the link below for the 2013 Cotton Harvest Aid Guidelines for Louisiana.


Ryegrass Management: Scout Now for Fall Control

Ryegrass Management: Scout Now for Fall Control published on No Comments on Ryegrass Management: Scout Now for Fall Control

Donnie Miller and Daniel Stephenson

LSU AgCenter

The lingering effects of winter temperatures and excessive moisture conditions into May will result in much later planting of soybean and cotton than in years past.  If anything positive can be taken from this scenario it is the fact that producers have time to scout their fields for ryegrass infestations and the need for control measures in the fall.  Ryegrass infestations were very prominent this year in many fields in Northeast Louisiana.  As is the case with most situations with ryegrass, infestations began primarily along head lands and drains within the field and appeared to be spreading out from there.  Ryegrass can linger into crops until temperatures increase and can cause problems with competition, especially under limited moisture conditions.  Effective control of infestations often requires a two-fold approach, with residual soil applied herbicides in the fall followed by POST treatment in late January for escapes.  The primary objective is to eliminate seed production and deplete the seed-bank over time.  The confirmation of glyphosate-resistant (GR) ryegrass in Mississippi several years ago led to a tremendous amount of research in the programs of Dr. Jason Bond and Dr. Tom Eubanks in identifying effective control measures.  These measures have proven very successful in research in Louisiana as well in the absence of GR plants.  The fact sheet below developed by Drs. Bond and Eubanks outlines control strategies for GR ryegrass in various cropping systems.  It is very important to remember that emerged plants need to be controlled at the time of fall residual application.


Rye Grass

The battle within the battle: Glyphosate Resistant Palmer amaranth

The battle within the battle: Glyphosate Resistant Palmer amaranth published on No Comments on The battle within the battle: Glyphosate Resistant Palmer amaranth

Donnie Miller and Daniel Stephenson

LSU AgCenter

Each year producers in Louisiana fight a constant battle against weed species bent on robbing yields and shrinking profit margins.  Due to the widespread adaptation of the Roundup Ready technology and subsequent overuse of only glyphosate for weed management, confirmation of weed resistance to glyphosate takes the battle to an entirely different level.  For several years, producers in Louisiana were fortunate to watch glyphosate resistance issues with Palmer amaranth played out in articles of Delta Farm Press regarding neighbors to the north in Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas.  The old adage “Mother Nature Always Wins” has unfortunately proven true again and resistance cases have been confirmed to glyphosate here in Louisiana.  The majority of parishes in Northeast and Northwest Louisiana boarding the Mississippi and Red Rivers, as well as St. Landry Parish, now have documented cases of glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth.  Seed from resistant populations in neighboring states is carried along these main waterways and distributed in adjacent fields with back water flooding and seep water in spring.  Three characteristics that make glyphosate resistance in Palmer amaranth such a problem are a very aggressive growth habit, tremendous seed producing capability, and a 73% germination rate.  In our perfect growing conditions in mid to late summer, it is not uncommon to see Palmer amaranth plants put on 8 to 10 inches of growth in a week’s period and produce viable seed.  Studies in Arkansas have shown that female plants are capable of producing up to 1.77 million seed.  At that rate, managing the weed becomes a numbers game.  Take for instance an area with 50 female plants that each produce 500,000 seed.  Let’s say that 90% of those seed are lost to predation or rot or other means.  Also, let’s say a producer implements a management strategy that provides 99% control.  He/she is still left with 4.975 million seed.  With a 73% germination rate, that means there is a potential to have 3.63 million plants, each capable of producing 1.77 million seed!!!

The main recommendation for preventing introduction of or managing an established population of glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth is to start clean with a planned rotation of herbicides that are effective on the weed species and offer a completely different mode of action, or means of controlling the weed, than glyphosate.  Switching from Roundup Powermax to Touchdown or Glyfos Xtra does no good as all are glyphosate products.  In corn, products like Callisto, Laudis, or products that contain atrazine are effective on Palmer amaranth and offer a differing mode of action that is not available in soybean or cotton.  In soybean, a number of products are effective soil applied on Palmer including Prefix, Boundary, Authority MTZ, Valor SX, Envive, Valor XLT among others.  In cotton, programs including preplant applications of Valor SX, Reflex, or Direx coupled with at planting application of Cotoran, Caparol, or Prowl have been proven effective on Palmer amaranth.  A number of postemergence options are also available within each crop.  Effective options for control of Palmer and other pigweed species are listed in the Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide which can be accessed at   An effective strategy for management of this weed is to overlay residual herbicides to never let the weed off the mat.  This includes application of residual herbicides preplant, at planting, in early season over-the-top applications, and at layby.  You always want an effective material present at peak strength when another is playing out.  This will ensure season long control of the weed.  Liberty 280 SL herbicide, used within the Liberty Link system and offering a different mode of action to glyphosate, is effective on pigweed species, including Palmer, if applied to very small weeds 1 inch or less.  Control of pigweed 2 to 4 inches can be somewhat erratic.  Addition of residual herbicides mentioned before at planting or included with Liberty in early over-the-top applications (Dual Magnum, Staple LX etc.) are needed for season long control.  Since Palmer amaranth has a light requirement for germination, burial of the seed utilizing deep tillage can prove effective in its management.  Germination and soil life are drastically reduced with seed burial of depths 2 inches are greater.  Re-hipping of row following deep tillage, however, negates this advantage by bringing seed up to light exposure and subsequent germination.  Prevention of seed production after removal of the crop is also essential to prevent replenishment of the seed bank.  Utilize whatever means necessary, be it hand rouging, tillage, or herbicides to prevent plants from producing seed.  Also remember that Palmer amaranth seed can be carried by equipment between fields so make sure it is thoroughly clean prior to entering/exiting fields, especially if custom harvesting is being utilized.

Another area to manage Palmer amaranth is on field turn-rows and ditch banks surrounding fields.  Allowing Palmer amaranth to grow on turn-rows and ditch banks and produce seed is an excellent way to infest the field.  Therefore, if Palmer amaranth is present on a turn-row prior to planting, the turn-row needs to be either tilled or paraquat should be applied to control it.  For best management, a soil-applied residual herbicide, such as the one a farmer will be applying to the field for Palmer amaranth management, should be tank-mixed with the paraquat.  Palmer amaranth management on a ditch bank is not as easy because of aquatic restrictions for many herbicides that are effective for Palmer amaranth control.  Herbicides that can be applied in aquatic situations, such as diuron and diquat, are alternatives for management of Palmer amaranth on ditch banks.  However, be sure to read the label to verify that a herbicide is labeled for use on in these situations.

Devastating effects of glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth are many and include loss in value of the technology on your farm, possible decreased land value, outright field abandonment, and increased production costs due to incorporation of additional herbicides and tillage needed for successful management of the weed.  In other words, all of the benefits associated with the Roundup Ready technology such as reduced herbicide use, reduced tillage, faster applications, are no longer realized. Therefore, use all available tools to prevent this problem from causing you to have to fight the battle within the battle.

Secondary Sidebar